Question 1
(1) Federico GarcÃa Lorca was 20th-century Spain's most famous poet and playwright.(2) Lorca was born on June 5, 1898, in a small town a few miles west of Granada, in southern Spain. (3) He was the oldest son of a wealthy landowner. (4) He studied literature and law at the University of Granada before turning to writing full-time. (5) In 1928, he published the most famous of all his poems, Gypsy Ballads, which used the rhythms of the traditional Spanish ballad to describe the Gypsies of southern Spain. (6) Gypsy Ballads was largely responsible for making Lorca famous throughout the Spanish-speaking world within a few years. (7) In June 1929, at a time when most young writers and painters dreamed of living in Paris, Federico Lorca broke with tradition and sailed for New York. (8) His nine months in New York changed his vision of poetry and the social role of the artist. (9) Lorca also traveled to Havana, Cuba. (10) He came to New York with the goal of learning English. (11) However, he spent most of his time writing poems in Spanish instead of studying English. (12) In 1936, Lorca left a collection of these poems, called Poet in New York, on the desk of his Madrid publisher with a note saying he would be 'back tomorrow,' probably to discuss final details. (13) He never returned. (14) Sadly, at the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War, Lorca was killed by political opponents in Granada. (15) Poet in New York was finally published in 1940.
In context, which of the following sentences would be best to insert between sentences 11 and 12 (reproduced below)? By those calculations, it would have taken sauropods a century to reach their full size. A different perspective developed when scientists began to more closely examine various features of sauropod bones.
Rationale
B) This rather implausible conclusion nonetheless persisted for years.
This sentence effectively bridges the gap between sentences 11 and 12. Sentence 11 talks about the initial calculations that led scientists to believe that it took sauropods a century to reach their full size. Sentence 12 introduces a shift in these initial beliefs. Thus, option B fits perfectly as it suggests a prolonged period where the initial and seemingly implausible belief persisted, before a different perspective developed.
A) Like all dinosaurs, sauropods hatched from eggs.
Although this statement is true, it does not provide a logical bridge between the discussion about the initially estimated growth rates of sauropods and the shift to a different perspective based on a closer examination of their bones.
C) For decades, sauropods were considered emblematic of the phenomenon of extinction.
This statement, while possibly true, does not provide a clear link between the initial concept of how long it took for sauropods to reach full size and the new perspective that was developed by scientists. The topic of extinction is not directly related to the growth rates of these creatures.
D) Sauropod fossils continue to be discovered in regions spread across the globe.
This statement does not provide a logical connection between the two sentences. It talks about the locations where sauropod fossils are found, which does not directly relate to the change in perspective about their growth rates.
Conclusion
The best sentence to insert between sentences 11 and 12 is "This rather implausible conclusion nonetheless persisted for years." This statement provides a logical bridge, indicating that the initial belief about the growth rates of sauropods persisted for a period before a different perspective was developed. The other options do not offer this logical connection, dealing instead with unrelated topics such as the hatching process of dinosaurs, their emblematic association with extinction, and the geographical locations of their fossils.