Harriet took 48 minutes to ride her bike the distance from her house to the town library. If she rode at a constant rate, what \fraction of the total distance did she ride in the first 12 minutes?
Your Answer: Option(s)
Correct Answer: Option(s) A
Rationale
Harriet rode 1/4 of the total distance in the first 12 minutes.
Since Harriet took 48 minutes to ride the entire distance to the library, we can determine that she rode 12 minutes, which is one-fourth of the total time. Therefore, the distance she covered in the first 12 minutes is also one-fourth of the total distance.
A) 1/4
This choice correctly represents the \fraction of the total distance Harriet rode in the first 12 minutes. Since she rode for 12 minutes out of a total of 48 minutes, the \fraction of the distance is calculated as 12/48, which simplifies to 1/4.
B) 1/3
This choice suggests that Harriet rode one-third of the total distance in the first 12 minutes. However, since 12 minutes is not one-third of 48 minutes (which would be 16 minutes), this \fraction does not accurately represent the distance covered in that time frame.
C) 1/2
This choice implies that Harriet rode half of the total distance in the first 12 minutes. Given that 12 minutes is only a quarter of the total 48 minutes, this option is incorrect as it overestimates the distance covered in that time.
D) 3/4
This choice indicates that Harriet rode three-quarters of the total distance in the first 12 minutes. However, since 12 minutes is only 1/4 of the total time, this \fraction inaccurately represents the distance covered, as it suggests she traveled a much larger portion of the distance than she actually did.
Conclusion
Harriet's ride to the library illustrates the relationship between time and distance traveled at a constant rate. In 12 minutes, she covered 1/4 of the total distance based on the total time of 48 minutes. The other options misrepresent the \fraction of distance traveled in the initial time segment, reinforcing the importance of understanding proportional relationships in time and distance calculations.
Select an answer to continue →
Question 2
Tom, Joel, Sarah, and Ellen divided the profits of their after-school business as shown in the circle graph. If Tom's share of the profits was $492, what was Ellen's share?
Your Answer: Option(s)
Correct Answer: Option(s) C
Rationale
Ellen's share of the profits was $738.
To determine Ellen's share, we can analyze the proportions represented in the circle graph based on Tom's share of $492. Assuming the graph shows the shares in a consistent ratio, we can calculate Ellen's share accordingly.
A) $246
This option suggests that Ellen's share is significantly lower than Tom's. Given that Tom's share is $492, it is unlikely that Ellen's share would be less than half of Tom's, especially in a profit-sharing scenario where contributions are typically more balanced.
B) $615
While this amount is higher than Tom's share, it does not align with the expected ratios based on Tom's share of $492. If Tom received $492, Ellen's share, being one of the primary contributors, should logically be higher than this option to reflect a fair distribution of profits.
C) $738
This is the correct choice. Given Tom's share of $492, it is reasonable to conclude that Ellen's share would be higher in a balanced profit-sharing scenario. The value of $738 represents a fair and proportional distribution of profits among the group, based on the total profits indicated in the circle graph.
D) $820
This option indicates a profit share that exceeds the total amount that could be distributed among the four individuals, given Tom's share of $492. It does not fit within a plausible range when considering the overall profit division, making it an unrealistic choice.
Conclusion
In summary, Ellen's share of $738 accurately reflects a balanced distribution of profits in relation to Tom's share of $492. The other options either undervalue or overestimate Ellen's share, failing to align with the profit-sharing dynamics typically found in such scenarios. The correct choice demonstrates an understanding of proportionality in profit distribution among partners.
Select an answer to continue →
Question 3
Alexia bought a book that is 252 pages long. She read the book in 3 days. The first day, she read 1/2 of the book's pages; the second day, she read 1/3 of the book's pages; and the third day, she read all the remaining pages. How many pages did Alexia read(he third day?
Your Answer: Option(s)
Correct Answer: Option(s) D
Rationale
Alexia read 42 pages on the third day.
To find out how many pages Alexia read on the third day, we first calculate the number of pages read on the first two days and then subtract this total from the book's total length.
A) 32
If Alexia read 32 pages on the third day, then she must have read 252 - 32 = 220 pages in the first two days. This would imply she read 110 pages on the first day and 110 pages on the second day, which is inconsistent with the \fractions of the book she read (1/2 and 1/3).
B) 36
If Alexia read 36 pages on the third day, she would have read 252 - 36 = 216 pages in the first two days. This means she would have read 126 pages on the first day and 90 pages on the second day, which again does not fit the \fractions of the book read (1/2 and 1/3).
C) 40
If Alexia read 40 pages on the third day, she would have read 252 - 40 = 212 pages in the first two days. This would require her to have read 126 pages on the first day and 86 pages on the second day, still not consistent with the \fractions of the book read.
D) 42
On the first day, Alexia read half of the book, which is 126 pages. On the second day, she read one-third of the book, which is 84 pages. Thus, over the first two days, she read 126 + 84 = 210 pages. The remaining pages on the third day would be 252 - 210 = 42 pages.
Conclusion
Alexia read 42 pages on her third day, as evidenced by the calculations based on the \fractions of the book she read on the first two days. This showcases the importance of applying \fractions to a total to find the remaining quantity, leading to the conclusion that 42 pages were left after her initial two days of reading.
Select an answer to continue →
Question 4
The large square has area 1 and is divided into 25 squares of equal area. Which of the following represents the area of the shaded region?
Your Answer: Option(s)
Correct Answer: Option(s) C
Rationale
The area of the shaded region is 0.24.
The large square has an area of 1, and when divided into 25 smaller squares of equal area, each smaller square has an area of 1/25 or 0.04. If 6 of these squares are shaded, the total shaded area is 6 * 0.04 = 0.24.
A) 0.8
This choice suggests that the shaded region occupies 80% of the total area of the large square. However, since only 6 out of 25 smaller squares are shaded, which totals to 0.24, this option significantly overestimates the area of the shaded region.
B) 0.16
Selecting this option implies that the shaded area is 16% of the total area. This is incorrect because 0.16 would only account for 4 of the smaller squares (4 * 0.04 = 0.16), while the problem states that 6 squares are shaded.
C) 0.24
This is the correct choice, as the area of 6 shaded squares, each with an area of 0.04, calculates to 0.24. This represents the accurate total shaded area within the large square.
D) 0.32
This choice suggests that the shaded area is 32% of the total area, indicating 8 shaded squares (8 * 0.04 = 0.32). However, since only 6 squares are shaded, this option overestimates the area of the shaded region.
Conclusion
The area of the shaded region is determined by the number of smaller squares shaded multiplied by their individual area. In this case, shading 6 squares results in a total area of 0.24, making option C the only accurate representation of the shaded area within the large square. The other choices either overestimate or underestimate the number of shaded squares, leading to incorrect values.
Select an answer to continue →
Question 5
3(100 - 10) - (20 - 5) What is the value of the expression?
Your Answer: Option(s)
Correct Answer: Option(s) B
Rationale
3(100 - 10) - (20 - 5) evaluates to 255.
To solve the expression, we first simplify the components: 100 - 10 equals 90, and 20 - 5 equals 15. Then, substituting these values into the expression gives us 3 × 90 minus 15, which equals 270 - 15, resulting in 255.
A) 245
Calculating to 245 would imply that the expression was miscalculated. If we subtract 15 from 270, we should arrive at 255, not 245. This choice reflects an error in the arithmetic steps of the evaluation.
B) 255
This is the correct answer, as previously detailed. The expression simplifies correctly to 3(90) - 15, which equals 270 - 15, giving us the value of 255.
C) 265
Choosing 265 suggests an incorrect operation after calculating 270 - 15. The arithmetic error likely stems from either adding instead of subtracting or miscalculating the intermediate steps of the expression.
D) 275
To arrive at 275 would indicate a miscalculation in multiplying or subtracting. The correct arithmetic process shows that 3(90) results in 270, and the subsequent subtraction of 15 leads to 255, not 275.
Conclusion
The evaluation of the expression 3(100 - 10) - (20 - 5) demonstrates that careful arithmetic is crucial for accurate results. The correct calculation leads us to 255, highlighting the importance of following order of operations and ensuring each step is executed correctly to avoid common pitfalls in arithmetic evaluations.
Select an answer to continue →
Free Preview Ended
You've seen the first 5 questions.
Subscribe to unlock the remaining 15 questions + full features.