Q 1 / 27
00:00
00:00
Elapsed
Question 1
For thousands of years, several characteristics have been consistent across human societies around the world. Animal husbandry, agriculture, and artistic expression are some of the similarities all societies share. Another similarity is the mustache. So now I mustache a question: why have mustaches had such a notable presence in human history? Humans have been shaving for as long as there has been facial hair to shave. However, it is in the past several centuries that mustaches have undergone a more creative transformation. Now, there are many different types of mustaches. The Handlebar, Pencil, and Walrus are only a few of the many types known today. With just a sharpened razor and some mustache wax, the creativity of people and their mustaches can be endless. Though the popularity of the mustache in different cultures varies over time, it has certainly influenced other creations. In the 1800s and early 1900s, mustaches were so popular that a new style of drinking cup, the mustache cup, was created. The mustache cup had a built-in covering over the top so mustaches would not be touched by the beverage. A more recent example of the mark of mustaches can be seen by the first World Mustache Tournament in 2013. The mustache truly is part of the human experience. Due to its place in the human experience, the mustache is a symbol with varied significance: power, prestige, beauty. When one thinks of mustaches, one may think of a villain from silent films, twisting the ends of his mustache. One may also think of a respected leader with a mustache of prominence. Perhaps one may think of people with famous mustaches: Tom Selleck, Burt Reynolds, and Charlie Chaplin, to name a few. No matter what one pictures when thinking of mustaches, it is clear that the mustache has a substantial effect on human perception.
What is a counterclaim to the argument presented in the passage?
Your Answer: Option(s)
Correct Answer: Option(s) D
Rationale
Beards may pose risks in certain professional occupations.
A counterclaim provides an opposite or contrasting view to the original argument. The passage presents an argument in favor of beards, and the statement that beards may pose risks in certain occupations directly challenges this view by suggesting a potential downside of having a beard.
A) Dyeing a beard pink is a common trend.
This statement does not offer a counterargument to the main argument presented in the passage. Instead, it provides additional information about a potential style choice for beards, which neither contradicts nor challenges the original argument.
B) Growing a beard offers a limited range of styles compared to a mustache.
While this statement might seem to present a contrasting view, it does not directly challenge the main argument of the passage. It simply offers a comparison between beards and mustaches, without presenting a clear objection or counterpoint to the original argument.
C) The beard is a passing trend that will eventually fade out.
This statement suggests that the popularity of beards may be temporary, but it does not directly counter the argument of the passage. It provides a speculative future perspective, rather than a present or factual counterargument.
D) Beards may pose risks in certain professional occupations.
This statement directly challenges the argument presented in the passage. By suggesting potential risks associated with beards, it provides a valid counterclaim that highlights a potential downside of having a beard, thus effectively opposing the original argument.
Conclusion
A valid counterclaim to an argument must provide a contrasting viewpoint or challenge to the original statement. In this case, the statement that beards may pose risks in certain professional occupations serves as an effective counterclaim to the main argument of the passage, as it presents a potential disadvantage of having a beard. The other options either provide additional information or offer a comparison without directly challenging the main argument.
Select an answer to continue →
Question 2
The Farallon's are now home to the world's largest population of western gull. Seals have returned, as well as otters and sea lions, which in turn attracts great white sharks. The combination of sharks, underwater currents, and jagged coastline are probably what earned the Farallon's their nickname "Devil's Teeth," though it hasn't stopped a few adventurous people from swimming. Four people have completed the 30-mile swim from the islands to San Francisco; the fastest person completed the journey in 14 hours.
Which of the following pieces of evidence does the author use to speculate why the Farallon Islands are called 'The Devil's Teeth'?
Your Answer: Option(s)
Correct Answer: Option(s) A
Rationale
The islands have sharks, choppy currents, and a jagged coastline.
The author indicates that the combination of sharks, underwater currents, and the jagged coastline likely contributed to the nickname "Devil's Teeth." This evidence is explicitly provided in the text as a reason for the islands’ ominous name.
A) The islands have sharks, choppy currents, and a jagged coastline.
This choice directly reflects the evidence presented in the extract. The author connects the presence of these dangerous elements to the nickname, suggesting that they contribute to the islands' fearsome reputation.
B) Swimming from San Francisco to the islands is very challenging.
While the difficulty of swimming from San Francisco to the islands is mentioned, it serves more as an interesting fact rather than evidence for the nickname. The challenging swim does not directly relate to the reasons behind the "Devil's Teeth" moniker, which focuses more on the natural hazards of the islands.
C) In 1863, violence broke out on the islands during a historical event.
This choice introduces an unrelated historical event that does not support the speculation about the nickname. The passage does not link this violence to the name "Devil's Teeth," making it irrelevant to the question.
D) They have always been called that by sailors who traveled past them.
This option suggests a historical context but lacks the explanatory evidence the author provides regarding the natural features of the islands. The nickname's origin is not attributed to sailors' accounts in the text, thereby making this choice less relevant.
Conclusion
The evidence for the nickname "Devil's Teeth" lies in the dangerous natural features of the Farallon Islands, including sharks, currents, and rugged coastlines. Choices B, C, and D do not provide relevant support for this speculation, as they either focus on unrelated challenges, historical events, or vague traditions without connecting to the characteristics that inspired the nickname. Thus, the most appropriate evidence is clearly identified in choice A.
Select an answer to continue →
Question 3
In 1932, the Australian government lost war against the native emu population. the operation that has since become known as great emu war began as an initiative to combat overpopulation of the crop-destroying birds invading farmland around Chandler and Walgooglan. The initial assault on the flightless avian began November 2 and lasted six days before the military personnel withdrew. efforts resumed on November 12, but by early December, the feathered foes had adopted guerrilla tactics against the targeted wheat fields, rendering military involvement largely ineffective. The Australian government declined further involvement with the ongoing conflict in 1934, 1943, and 1948, despite repeated pleas for assistance by the farmers in the area.
Which of the following statements is a logical conclusion based on this report?
Your Answer: Option(s)
Correct Answer: Option(s) D
Rationale
Emus continued to destroy crops in the area through the 1930s and 1940s.
The report indicates that the emu population was problematic for farmers, leading to the initial military intervention in 1932, and despite attempts to combat the birds, the conflict continued without government support in subsequent years. This suggests that the emus remained a persistent issue for crop damage during the specified decades.
A) After losing the support of the Australian government, farmers engaged in guerrilla warfare to combat the emus in 1934, 1943, and 1948.
There is no evidence in the report to suggest that farmers adopted guerrilla warfare tactics against the emus after losing government support. Instead, the report notes that farmers repeatedly sought assistance but did not engage in military actions themselves.
B) From 1932 to 1948, the Australian government battled emus on behalf of farmers. After losing the Great Emu War in 1932.
This statement misrepresents the timeline and nature of events. The Australian government did not continue to battle emus from 1932 to 1948; rather, they ceased military involvement following the initial failed attempts, as indicated by the lack of support in subsequent years.
C) The Australian government provided limited military support to farmers in 1934, 1943, and 1948.
The report specifically states that the government declined further involvement in 1934, 1943, and 1948, contradicting the notion that they provided any military support during those years. Thus, this statement is inaccurate.
Conclusion
The report clearly outlines the failure of the Great Emu War and the resulting ongoing issues faced by farmers due to the emu population. The only logical conclusion, supported by the text, is that emus continued to damage crops throughout the 1930s and 1940s, demonstrating the persistence of the problem despite the lack of government intervention.
Select an answer to continue →
Question 4
Don't Look Back Now is the story of Keisha (Joy Taylor) a woman who has moved across the country to escape her creepy ex-boyfriend stalker, Tom (Kevin Highsmith) however, mysterious things keep happening to the people in Keisha's life- she got a secret that will make anyone coming to harm her regret it - especially tom this thriller is an exciting roller coaster that constantly keeps the audience guessing. director Juliette Che knows exactly how to manipulate the camera to capture every shadow and peripheral movement. keeping the viewer on edge. the close-up shots feel claustrophobic like the perspective is skewed. for another movie, this might be annoying. but for this one, it helps put the viewer in Keisha's suspicious shoes very well. with a running time of 98 minutes, the pacing is quick and efficient, and Cho uses cinematography deftly to show the quick and jerky passage of time from Keisha's perspective. The performance are rocks solid all the way through joy Taylor is brittle and violent simmering below the surface with rage. you can see the toll this stalking experience has had on her in every twitch of her eye and clench of her jaw. the strength she displays once the film shifts into the darker, triumphant second act is a wonder to behold. Kevin Highsmith gives off just the right vibe of charming and sinister as Tom, effortlessly shifting his enter performance between sweet and suddenly dangerous. This is a tense thrill ride that will not disappoint fans of Joy Taylor or this genre general you can find don't look back now at the Main Street Metroplex 12 and the movie Palace 20 starting Friday.
What conclusion could a reader make from this passage?
Your Answer: Option(s)
Correct Answer: Option(s) B
Rationale
There is a big twist in the second half of the movie.
The passage describes a shift in the film's narrative during the second act, indicating that Keisha displays strength and triumph, suggesting a significant development or twist in the story. This pivotal moment is highlighted as a wonder to behold, pointing to an unexpected turn that engages the viewer.
A) Juliette Che is an experienced director.
While the passage praises Juliette Che's skill in manipulating the camera and creating tension, it does not provide specific information about her overall experience or previous works as a director. Therefore, this conclusion cannot be definitively drawn from the text.
B) There is a big twist in the second half of the movie.
The passage explicitly mentions a shift into a darker, triumphant second act where Keisha's character displays unexpected strength. This indicates a significant plot development or twist, making this choice a valid conclusion based on the information provided.
C) The film has a sad ending.
The passage does not indicate that the film concludes with sadness. Instead, it mentions triumph in the second act, which suggests a more complex and possibly positive resolution rather than a solely sad ending.
D) Tom is unable to protect Keisha from her stalker.
The text describes Tom as charming yet sinister, but it does not directly address his protective abilities or actions regarding Keisha's safety. This conclusion is not supported by the information provided, which focuses more on Keisha's response to her situation than on Tom's role in it.
Conclusion
The passage reveals that "Don't Look Back Now" includes a significant narrative twist in its second act, highlighting Keisha's growth and strength in the face of adversity. While the text offers insights into the film's direction, pacing, and performances, the most supported conclusion is that the story includes a big twist that reshapes the viewer's understanding of the characters and their struggles.
Select an answer to continue →
Question 5
Grandma Harry 30 minutes Cookies/Desserts Makes 1 Dozen
1 egg white
3/4 sugar
1 cup peanut Vanilla
1/2 cup flour
Beat egg white until foamy. Stir in sugar, beat again until stiff peaks form.
gently fold in peanut butter and vanilla. Add flour in small increments
until dough forms. Chill dough for at least 2 hours. rolls into ball, Roll in sugar, press down with a fork, and bake at 350 degrees F for 10 to 12 minutes. let cool on cookie sheet. these are very fragile.
1 egg white
3/4 sugar
1 cup peanut Vanilla
1/2 cup flour
Beat egg white until foamy. Stir in sugar, beat again until stiff peaks form.
gently fold in peanut butter and vanilla. Add flour in small increments
until dough forms. Chill dough for at least 2 hours. rolls into ball, Roll in sugar, press down with a fork, and bake at 350 degrees F for 10 to 12 minutes. let cool on cookie sheet. these are very fragile.
Which of the following statements is true?
Your Answer: Option(s)
Correct Answer: Option(s) D
Rationale
Each ball of dough must be pressed down with a fork before baking.
Pressing down the dough balls with a fork is a required step in the cookie-making process, ensuring they flatten and bake evenly, which contributes to the desired texture of the cookies.
A) When beating the eggs and sugar, you shouldn't stop until stiff peaks form.
While it is important to achieve stiff peaks when beating the egg white and sugar, the statement is misleading because it does not specify that you should stop once stiff peaks are reached. Continuing to beat beyond this point could lead to overbeating, which can affect the final texture of the cookies.
B) After adding flour, the cookies are baked for 10 to 12 minutes.
This statement is partially true but misleading. The cookies are not baked immediately after adding flour; instead, the dough must first be chilled for at least 2 hours. This chilling is essential for the proper formation of the cookie's texture and stability during baking.
C) The egg white and vanilla are beaten together in a bowl.
This statement is incorrect as the recipe specifies that the egg white is beaten first until foamy, and then sugar is added before incorporating the vanilla. Thus, the egg white and vanilla are not beaten together initially, making this statement inaccurate.
Conclusion
In the process of making Grandma Harry's cookies, the requirement to press down each ball of dough with a fork before baking is a crucial step. While other statements touch on important aspects of the recipe, they either misrepresent the process or omit necessary steps, indicating that pressing down the dough is the only unambiguous truth among the options. Understanding these nuances is essential for achieving the best results in cookie preparation.
Select an answer to continue →
Free Preview Ended
You've seen the first 5 questions.
Subscribe to unlock the remaining 22 questions + full features.
0%
score
0/0 correct
0
streak
Answered
0/27
Correct
0
Wrong
0
27 left
You are leaving this quiz
What would you like to do with your progress?
You're in the middle of a quiz
What would you like to do before switching?
Report an Issue
Help us improve by flagging this content.
Rate this Practice Test
How helpful was this material?