Which of the following language conventions is violated in the sentence: 'The gist of the saying went something like this: If a person wants to get ahead in life, they have to be willing to work for it'?

Rationale

Pronoun-antecedent agreement is violated in the sentence.

In the sentence provided, the antecedent "a person" is singular, while the pronoun "they" used to refer to it is plural. This mismatch creates a grammatical inconsistency, violating the principle of pronoun-antecedent agreement.

A (Punctuation of an introductory clause) YOUR ANSWER

The sentence does not violate punctuation rules related to introductory clauses. The phrase "The gist of the saying went something like this" is correctly punctuated, and the colon that follows introduces the quote effectively. Thus, this option does not apply to the error in the sentence.

B (Use of a colon) YOUR ANSWER

The use of the colon in the sentence is appropriate and serves its purpose of introducing a quotation. There are no grammatical violations regarding colons; therefore, this choice does not identify the issue present in the sentence.

C (Pronoun-antecedent agreement) CORRECT

This choice accurately identifies the violation in the sentence. The singular noun "a person" should be matched with a singular pronoun, such as "he" or "she," rather than the plural "they." This lack of agreement creates confusion regarding the subject being referenced.

D (Verb tense) YOUR ANSWER

The verb tense in the sentence is consistent and correctly uses the past tense "went," which aligns with the context of discussing a saying. Thus, this option does not point to any errors within the sentence.

Conclusion

Pronoun-antecedent agreement is a crucial aspect of grammar that ensures clarity and coherence in writing. In the given sentence, the mismatch between the singular antecedent "a person" and the plural pronoun "they" highlights a significant grammatical error. The other options do not correctly address any violations, emphasizing the importance of adhering to grammatical conventions to maintain clear communication.

Which of the following language conventions is violated in the sentence: 'The gist of the saying went something like this: If a person wants to get ahead in life, they have to be willing to work for it'?

Pronoun-antecedent agreement is violated in the sentence.

Related Questions

Related Quizzes

How familiar were you with this question?

Report an Issue

Rate this Practice Test