Which of the following best describes an influence of the philosophy of pragmatism on government in the early 1900s?

While military intervention did occur, this approach is more aligned with imperialistic policies rather than pragmatism. The use of military force typically reflects a more traditional or aggressive diplomatic strategy, which does not inherently prioritize practical, evidence-based solutions to social problems.

Bipartisanship may reflect a pragmatic approach to garnering support; however, it does not specifically illustrate the influence of pragmatism in terms of implementing solutions. Pragmatism emphasizes practical outcomes in governance, rather than merely political strategies for electoral success.

This choice reflects a prioritization of economic stability over worker rights, which is more indicative of legalistic rather than pragmatic influences. Pragmatism encourages finding workable solutions to problems rather than strictly maintaining existing economic structures.

This choice represents a laissez-faire approach, which contrasts with pragmatism's emphasis on intervention when necessary to solve social issues. Pragmatism would advocate for active engagement in economic matters to ensure practical outcomes rather than purely relying on competition.