In The Prince, Machiavelli advocated a new political theory that

Machiavelli does not claim that the state is of divine origin; instead, he argues that political power is derived from human actions and decisions. His focus is on realpolitik rather than religious justification, advocating for a secular understanding of leadership.

While religion plays a role in the political landscape he discusses, Machiavelli does not argue that princes should justify their actions based on religious grounds. Instead, he emphasizes practical and sometimes amoral approaches to governance, setting aside religious considerations in favor of political expediency.

Machiavelli acknowledges that rulers may need to break promises if it serves their interests or the stability of the state. He is realistic about the nature of politics, suggesting that the maintenance of power may sometimes necessitate dishonesty or betrayal, contrary to the ideal of honoring commitments.

Machiavelli's approach is distinctly secular and pragmatic, focusing on the efficacy of policies rather than divine approval. He does not seek to establish a moral or religious framework for governance, but rather a strategy based on observable political realities.