An attacker secretly intercepts and alters communications between an online banking website and its customers to transfer funds without detection. Which type of attack is this?
Man-in-the-middle attack.
This type of attack occurs when an attacker secretly intercepts and alters communications between two parties, allowing them to manipulate the information exchanged without either party's knowledge. In the context of online banking, this enables unauthorized fund transfers while evading detection.
Phishing attacks involve tricking individuals into revealing sensitive information, such as passwords or credit card numbers, by masquerading as a trustworthy entity in electronic communications. Unlike man-in-the-middle attacks, phishing does not require intercepting or altering data in transit; instead, it relies on social engineering to deceive users into providing their information directly.
This is the correct answer as it accurately describes the scenario where an attacker intercepts and manipulates the communication between an online banking website and its customers. By being positioned between the two parties, the attacker can alter messages and transactions, facilitating unauthorized fund transfers without detection.
Brute-force attacks involve systematically trying all possible combinations of credentials, such as passwords, until the correct one is found. This method does not involve intercepting or altering communications but rather focuses on breaking into accounts through sheer computational power, making it irrelevant to the scenario presented in the question.
Spoofing attacks occur when an attacker impersonates a legitimate user or device to gain unauthorized access to information or systems. Although spoofing can be a component of a man-in-the-middle attack, it does not specifically describe the interception and alteration of communication, which is the hallmark of a man-in-the-middle attack.
In summary, a man-in-the-middle attack is characterized by the interception and manipulation of communications between two parties, allowing for unauthorized transactions without detection. While other attack types like phishing, brute-force, and spoofing have their distinct methods and goals, they do not encompass the specific scenario of altering communications as described in the question. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for cybersecurity awareness and defense strategies.
Related Questions
View allA business configures its network with a central device that connects...
A network is set up with a single communication line where all devices...
Which scenario demonstrates a violation of the integrity component of...
A user is unable to send emails using the SMTP protocol. Which OSI lay...
A company needs to connect two different networks. Which device should...
Related Quizzes
View all0PC1 Planning Instructional Strategies for Meaningful Learning Version 1
AP01 Elementary Literacy Curriculum Version 1
AQ01 Applied Healthcare Statistics C784 Version 1
ASO1 Introduction to Statistics for Research Version 1
BJ01 Introduction to Business Finance Version 1
C180 Introduction to Psychology Version 1
C180 Introduction to Psychology Version 2
CKC1 Introduction to Humanities Version 1
DZ01 Mathematics for Elementary Educators III MATH 1330 Version 1
FF01 Human Growth and Development Version 1
- ✓ 500+ Practice Questions
- ✓ Detailed Explanations
- ✓ Progress Analytics
- ✓ Exam Simulations