Difficulty: Medium

Average Score: 57%

One of the goals of Populism was to

Rationale

A governmental policy of laissez-faire toward business.

Social Darwinists advocated for minimal governmental intervention in economic matters, believing that the survival of the fittest would naturally lead to societal progress. They argued that allowing businesses to operate without regulation would promote competition and lead to the success of the most capable enterprises.

A (reduce income tax) YOUR ANSWER

A graduated income tax imposes higher rates on those with greater income, which contradicts the Social Darwinist preference for minimal state intervention in economic affairs. This tax structure is seen as a form of economic redistribution, which Social Darwinists would oppose as it interferes with natural competition and individual success.

B (implement government ownership of the countrys railroads and telegraph) CORRECT

Implementing building and sanitation codes aims to improve living conditions for the underprivileged, which runs counter to the Social Darwinist belief in allowing societal evolution through natural selection. They would argue that such regulations protect the less capable at the expense of the more capable.

D (form a coalition party with the Democrats) YOUR ANSWER

Government assistance for individuals with disabilities provides support that Social Darwinists typically reject, as they believe that such aid undermines the principles of natural selection. In their view, the government should not intervene to support those who are deemed less capable.

E (obtain suffrage for all farmers) YOUR ANSWER

Regulating trade contradicts the laissez-faire philosophy that Social Darwinists endorse. They believe that free competition without regulatory constraints is essential for determining which businesses succeed or fail based on their merits.

Conclusion

Social Darwinists championed the idea of minimal governmental interference in business, aligning with laissez-faire principles that promote competition. The other options, which advocate for economic intervention or support for the disadvantaged, stand in stark contrast to this ideology. By supporting a laissez-faire approach, Social Darwinists believed that society would naturally progress, benefiting the strongest and most capable individuals and enterprises.

Related Questions

View all