A large firm needs to dismiss the bottom 5% of its workforce and wants to use a performance appraisal system to choose which workers should be laid-off. Which type of performance appraisal is appropriate in this context?
A forced-distribution appraisal by a supervisor is appropriate in this context.
This method allows the firm to categorize employees into performance tiers, ensuring that the bottom 5% can be identified and dismissed based on relative performance. The forced distribution method effectively enforces a standard evaluation across the workforce, which aligns with the firm's goal of laying off the lowest performers.
This approach involves peers writing descriptive evaluations of each other’s performance. While it can provide qualitative insights, it lacks a structured framework to quantify performance levels, making it unsuitable for identifying a specific percentage of employees to dismiss.
This method requires the supervisor to rank employees into a specified distribution, such as a bell curve, where only a certain percentage can fall into the lowest performance category. This structure is ideal for the firm’s objective of laying off the bottom 5%, as it directly facilitates identifying the necessary employees for dismissal.
In this system, employees are compared against each other in pairs to determine who performs better. Although this could yield some comparative performance insights, it may not be efficient for determining a fixed percentage of layoffs due to the complexity and time-consuming nature of this method.
Similar to the supervisor method, this approach involves peers comparing each other. However, it still lacks the systematic rigor required to yield a clear cutoff for layoffs, making it less effective for fulfilling the firm’s need to dismiss a specific percentage of the workforce.
To effectively identify the bottom 5% of performers for layoffs, a forced-distribution appraisal by a supervisor is the most suitable method. This approach ensures a standardized evaluation process, enabling the firm to meet its objective of fairly and systematically determining which employees should be dismissed based on their relative performance. Other appraisal methods do not provide the necessary structure for such quantifiable outcomes.
Related Questions
View allWhich legislation enforcement is out of the scope for the Equal Employ...
A pharmaceutical firm employs salespeople throughout the nation and wi...
What is a benefit associated with learning organizations?
A company's accounting department manager asks the human resources dep...
Why are reliable selection procedures important to an organization?
Related Quizzes
View all0PC1 Planning Instructional Strategies for Meaningful Learning Version 1
AP01 Elementary Literacy Curriculum Version 1
AQ01 Applied Healthcare Statistics C784 Version 1
ASO1 Introduction to Statistics for Research Version 1
BJ01 Introduction to Business Finance Version 1
C172 Network and Security Foundations Version 1
C180 Introduction to Psychology Version 1
C180 Introduction to Psychology Version 2
CKC1 Introduction to Humanities Version 1
DZ01 Mathematics for Elementary Educators III MATH 1330 Version 1
- ✓ 500+ Practice Questions
- ✓ Detailed Explanations
- ✓ Progress Analytics
- ✓ Exam Simulations