Which performance metric best measures master-schedule stability?

While average inventory turnover indicates how efficiently inventory is managed and sold over a period, it does not directly reflect the stability of the master schedule. High turnover might suggest good sales performance, but it does not account for the frequency of schedule changes, which is essential for assessing stability in scheduling.

This metric measures the efficiency and reliability of the fulfillment process but does not address the stability of the master schedule. A high percentage of on-time deliveries might occur despite frequent schedule changes, meaning that this measure does not provide insight into the predictability of the scheduling process itself.

Capacity utilisation rate reflects how much of the available capacity is being used in production. While it offers insights into operational efficiency, it does not specifically measure how stable the master schedule is. Fluctuations in capacity utilisation can occur regardless of how stable or unstable the master schedule might be.