Difficulty: Easy

Average Score: 91%

Which one of the following options best describes how Thurman supports his argument?

Rationale

Thurman supports his argument by evoking feelings of annoyance and relief.

Through his argument, Thurman effectively uses emotional appeals to engage his audience. By strategically eliciting feelings of annoyance and then relief, he draws his readers into his perspective and makes his argument more compelling.

A (By addressing his audience at just the right moment) YOUR ANSWER

While the timing of an address can certainly impact its effectiveness, there is no indication in the text that Thurman's argument relies on a specific moment of address. Therefore, this choice is not the best description of how Thurman supports his argument.

B (By appealing to a shared sense of community and values) YOUR ANSWER

While appealing to a shared sense of community and values can be a powerful persuasive tool, the text does not show that Thurman uses this technique to support his argument. His argument focuses more on individual emotions rather than collective values or community connections.

C (By evoking feelings of annoyance and relief) CORRECT

Indeed, Thurman's argument is supported by the deliberate elicitation of emotional responses. He first stokes feelings of annoyance, likely about the issue at hand, then provides relief, probably through his proposed solution or perspective. This emotional journey engages the reader and strengthens his argument.

D (By presenting evidence and logical explanations) YOUR ANSWER

While presenting evidence and logical explanations is a common way of supporting an argument, the text does not suggest that Thurman uses this approach. His argument is more rooted in emotional appeal rather than in empirical evidence or logic.

Conclusion

Thurman supports his argument by evoking specific emotions in his audience, specifically feelings of annoyance followed by relief. This strategy of emotional appeal effectively draws readers into his perspective and makes his argument more compelling. The other options—addressing the audience at the right moment, appealing to a shared sense of community and values, and presenting evidence and logical explanations—do not accurately describe the techniques Thurman uses to support his argument according to the text.

Related Questions

View all