Difficulty: Medium

Average Score: 66%

Which of the following statements is a logical conclusion based on this report?

Rationale

Emus continued to destroy crops in the area through the 1930s and 1940s.

Based on the extract provided, it is most logical to conclude that emus continued to pose a threat to crops in the area throughout the 1930s and 1940s. This is consistent with the information given in the report and doesn't make any unsupported assumptions.

A (After losing the support of the Australian government, farmers engaged in guerrilla warfare to combat the emus in 1934, 1943, and 1948.) YOUR ANSWER

The extract doesn't provide any information to suggest that farmers resorted to guerrilla warfare against the emus following the withdrawal of government support. This choice involves speculative conclusions not grounded in the provided report.

B (From 1932 to 1948, the Australian government battled emus on behalf of farmers. After losing the Great Emu War in 1932.) YOUR ANSWER

This choice is incorrect as it inaccurately states the Australian government continued to actively battle emus on behalf of farmers until 1948. The extract does not provide information about the government's involvement in emu conflicts for the entire period from 1932 to 1948.

C (The Australian government provided limited military support to farmers in 1934, 1943, and 1948.) YOUR ANSWER

While the extract might suggest that the government provided some support, it does not specify the years of support nor the extent of the military assistance offered. This choice presents specific claims that are not directly supported by the information in the report.

Conclusion

Given the information in the extract, the most logical conclusion is that emus continued causing problems for farmers by destroying crops throughout the 1930s and 1940s. The other choices introduce details not supported by the provided information, making them less reliable conclusions based on the report.

Related Questions

View all