Which of the following is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 6 (reproduced below)? Some researchers have cited this evidence as it made an argument that MSA hunters were less skilled than LSA hunters.

Rationale

Some researchers have cited this evidence to make an argument that MSA hunters were less skilled than LSA hunters.

The phrase "to make" is the most appropriate choice as it clearly indicates that the evidence is used for the purpose of constructing an argument. This structure maintains the intended meaning and improves the sentence's clarity.

A ((as it is now)) YOUR ANSWER

The original phrasing "as it made an argument" is awkward and can lead to confusion about the relationship between the evidence and the argument. It implies a completed action instead of conveying that the evidence is still being used to support an argument.

B (evidence and were making) YOUR ANSWER

This option introduces a grammatical inconsistency by using the past progressive tense "were making," which does not align with the context. It suggests a simultaneous action that is not clearly tied to the cited evidence, detracting from the clarity of the sentence.

C (evidence, having made) YOUR ANSWER

The phrase "having made" suggests that the argument has already been established, which alters the intended meaning. It implies a completed action that disconnects the evidence from its ongoing role in supporting the argument, making it less effective.

D (evidence to make) CORRECT

This choice effectively clarifies that the researchers are using the evidence for the specific purpose of making an argument. It directly connects the evidence with its intended use, enhancing the sentence's overall clarity and coherence.

Conclusion

The best option for the underlined portion is "to make," which effectively links the evidence to its purpose in the argument. The other choices either create grammatical inconsistencies, alter the intended meaning, or lack clarity. By using precise language, the sentence communicates the researchers' intent more clearly, ensuring that the relationship between the evidence and the argument is readily understood.