Difficulty: Easy

Average Score: 100%

Which of the following best explains why the highlighted sentence is ineffective as a supporting detail?

Rationale

The sentence lacks specific evidence to support the claim.

A supporting detail is most effective when it provides concrete evidence that bolsters the main argument. In this case, the highlighted sentence fails to present specific examples or data, making it ineffective in reinforcing the point it aims to support.

A (The sentence uses limited vocabulary and vague language.) YOUR ANSWER

While the use of vocabulary and clarity are important for effective communication, this option does not address the primary issue. The main reason the sentence is ineffective is not solely due to vague language, but rather its lack of specific evidence to substantiate the claim being made.

B (The claim made in the sentence detracts from the main argument.) YOUR ANSWER

This choice suggests that the highlighted sentence undermines the argument, which may not be the case. The sentence may attempt to support the main argument but simply fails to do so effectively due to a lack of concrete evidence rather than detracting from it.

C (The information presented in the sentence is not accurate.) YOUR ANSWER

The effectiveness of a supporting detail is not solely determined by accuracy; rather, it is also contingent on the detail's relevance and the strength of the evidence provided. If the information were accurate but lacked specificity, it would still be ineffective in supporting the argument.

Conclusion

Effective supporting details require specific evidence to substantiate claims made within an argument. In this instance, the highlighted sentence's failure to provide such evidence renders it ineffective, despite any potential accuracy or clarity in language. Consequently, enhancing the detail with concrete examples would significantly improve its ability to support the main argument.

Related Questions

View all