Difficulty: Hard

Average Score: 36%

Which data should an analyst mark as inadequate in terms of currency in collection?

Rationale

Data that are no longer circulated should be marked as inadequate in terms of currency in collection.

Currency in data collection refers to the timeliness and relevance of the data being used. Data that are no longer circulated are outdated and may not accurately reflect current conditions, making them less useful for analysis.

A (Sources that do not answer the research question) YOUR ANSWER

While sources that do not address the research question may be deemed irrelevant or unhelpful, they do not necessarily pertain to the currency of the data. Such sources may still be recent or current, even if they do not provide the required information.

C (Samples that represent one segment of a population) YOUR ANSWER

Samples that represent only one segment of a population may present issues regarding representativeness, but this does not directly relate to the currency of the data. Currency focuses on the temporal relevance of the data rather than its comprehensiveness or inclusivity.

D (Sources that have not been compared to peers) YOUR ANSWER

The lack of peer comparison may affect the reliability or validity of the data, but it does not inherently indicate that the data is outdated or lacking in currency. Peer comparison is more about context and quality rather than the timeliness of the information.

Conclusion

Inadequate currency in data collection is primarily identified by the age and relevance of the data. Data that are no longer circulated are outdated and therefore unsuitable for current analysis, while the other options focus on aspects of relevance, representation, and quality rather than the critical factor of currency. Ensuring data currency is essential for accurate and timely analysis, making option B the correct choice.

Related Questions

View all