Difficulty: Medium

Average Score: 60%

What is a benefit of in-house development and maintenance of information technology systems?

Rationale

Creates a better quality workforce by combining both technical and business skills.

In-house development and maintenance of information technology systems fosters a workforce that possesses both technical expertise and business acumen. This integration leads to improved communication between IT and other departments, enhancing overall project outcomes and aligning technology with organizational goals.

A (Allows for the fastest development time and ability to scale to new demand levels) YOUR ANSWER

While in-house teams can be agile, this choice overlooks the potential delays associated with resource limitations and the need for extensive training. Outsourcing can often provide quicker access to skilled professionals who can scale resources rapidly to meet fluctuating demands, making this statement less accurate.

B (Increases financial savings because it costs less than outsourcing the work) YOUR ANSWER

In-house development may not always yield financial savings, as maintaining a full-time staff, infrastructure, and ongoing training can be costly. Outsourcing can provide cost efficiencies by leveraging specialized providers who can perform tasks at a lower expense due to economies of scale.

C (Utilizes state-of-the-art technological resources without having to acquire and maintain them) YOUR ANSWER

This statement is more aligned with outsourcing benefits, where companies can leverage the latest technologies from vendors without the burden of acquisition and maintenance. In-house systems often require ongoing investment in technology and training to stay current, which contradicts this claim.

Conclusion

The in-house development of IT systems primarily enhances the quality of the workforce by fostering a blend of technical and business skills. This synergy leads to better project alignment with business objectives and improved communication across teams. Other choices fail to capture the unique advantages of in-house development, emphasizing speed, cost, and technology utilization, which are often more effectively addressed through outsourcing.

Related Questions

View all