The essence of the saying was something like this: If a person wants to get ahead in life, they have to be willing to work for it. Which of the following language conventions is violated in the sentence above?

Rationale

Pronoun-antecedent agreement is violated in the sentence.

In the sentence provided, the pronoun "they" does not agree with its antecedent "a person," which is singular. This mismatch in number creates a grammatical inconsistency, making the sentence incorrect according to standard English conventions.

A (Use of a colon) YOUR ANSWER

A colon is used to introduce lists, quotations, or explanations, but it is not relevant to the provided sentence. The sentence does not require a colon for clarity or structure, thus this choice does not address any violations present in the text.

B (Verb tense) YOUR ANSWER

Verb tense refers to the time at which the action occurs, such as past, present, or future. The verb "wants" is appropriately in the present tense to match the context of the sentence. Therefore, there is no violation in verb tense, making this option incorrect.

C (Punctuation of an introductory clause) YOUR ANSWER

The sentence does not contain an introductory clause that requires specific punctuation rules. The structure of the sentence is straightforward and does not necessitate additional punctuation; thus, this option does not highlight any grammatical errors.

D (Pronoun-antecedent agreement) CORRECT

The pronoun "they" is plural, while its antecedent, "a person," is singular. This discrepancy creates a violation of pronoun-antecedent agreement rules, which state that pronouns must match their antecedents in number and gender. This is the correct identification of the grammatical issue in the sentence.

Conclusion

Pronoun-antecedent agreement is a crucial aspect of grammatical accuracy in writing. In the examined sentence, the singular antecedent "a person" is mismatched with the plural pronoun "they," leading to confusion. Recognizing and correcting such violations ensures clarity and correctness in communication.

The essence of the saying was something like this: If a person wants to get ahead in life, they have to be willing to work for it. Which of the following language conventions is violated in the sentence above?

Pronoun-antecedent agreement is violated in the sentence.

Related Questions

Related Quizzes

How familiar were you with this question?

Report an Issue

Rate this Practice Test