Parasitic worm infestation is hypothesized to be damaging to the host. However, scientists have recently discovered that worm infestation can relieve the effects of certain autoimmune disorders. In which of the following ways should the hypothesis be modified, given the new findings?

This choice inaccurately implies that worm infestation completely prevents immune system issues. While there may be a regulatory effect, the statement does not acknowledge the nuanced relationship between worms and the immune response, particularly in the context of autoimmune disorders.

This option contradicts the new findings, which highlight that rather than worsening immune reactions, worm infestations can actually help alleviate some autoimmune symptoms. The term "exacerbate" is misleading and does not reflect the beneficial aspect discovered in recent research.

While the lack of exposure to certain parasites may contribute to the rise of autoimmune disorders, this statement oversimplifies the issue. It implies a direct causation that is not necessarily supported by evidence, as autoimmune disorders can arise from a variety of genetic and environmental factors beyond just the presence of worms.