An analyst would like to communicate the function of each Structured Query Language (SQL) query written. Which practice should the analyst follow?

While using indentation improves the visual structure and readability of SQL queries, it does not explicitly communicate the function of the query. Indentation helps in organizing the code but lacks the descriptive context that comments provide, which are essential for conveying the purpose of each part of the query.

While shorter queries may be easier to read and understand at a glance, they do not inherently communicate their function. Complex operations often require longer queries for clarity and functionality, and brevity might sacrifice necessary detail. Comments are preferable for conveying the intent behind any length of query.

Using uppercase letters for SQL keywords can improve readability by making them stand out, but it does not provide any contextual information about the query's function. Like indentation, this practice focuses solely on formatting rather than enhancing the understanding of the query's purpose.