A researcher wants to determine whether smartphones can be used to positively impact clinical outcomes of cardiac patients… proceeds to research and document another 100 related studies. Which research method is this researcher using?
Meta-analysis
A meta-analysis involves systematically reviewing and synthesizing data from multiple studies to draw broader conclusions regarding a specific research question. In this case, the researcher is aggregating findings from 100 related studies to evaluate the impact of smartphones on cardiac patients, which exemplifies the characteristics of a meta-analysis.
A cohort study follows a group of individuals over time to observe outcomes related to a specific exposure or treatment. While it can reveal associations, it does not involve synthesizing data from multiple studies; rather, it focuses on tracking a single cohort. Therefore, this research method does not apply to the researcher’s approach of combining findings from numerous studies.
A case study involves an in-depth investigation of a single individual, group, or event to explore its complexities and contexts. This method lacks the breadth of analysis across multiple studies. Since the researcher is examining and integrating data from 100 different studies, a case study is not the appropriate method.
A clinical trial tests the effects of a specific intervention or treatment on participants in a controlled setting. This method primarily focuses on experimental data rather than reviewing existing literature. As the researcher is not testing a new intervention but rather analyzing existing studies, a clinical trial does not fit this scenario.
A meta-analysis is the statistical analysis of a large collection of studies related to a specific research question, enabling researchers to draw broader conclusions based on aggregated data. The researcher’s action of reviewing and documenting findings from 100 related studies directly aligns with this definition, confirming it as the correct choice.
In this scenario, the researcher is conducting a meta-analysis by compiling and analyzing data from multiple studies to assess the impact of smartphones on cardiac patients. This method is essential for synthesizing existing research, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of clinical outcomes. The other options—cohort study, case study, and clinical trial—do not accurately represent the researcher’s systematic review of prior studies.
Related Questions
View allWhich two statements describe characteristics of quantitative and qual...
A hospital administrator has observed excess readmissions… How should...
A large urban hospital implemented a new patient registration system…...
Many large integrated delivery networks have a common electronic medic...
A clinical researcher wants to compare patient outcomes from a new pra...
Related Quizzes
View all0PC1 Planning Instructional Strategies for Meaningful Learning Version 1
AP01 Elementary Literacy Curriculum Version 1
AQ01 Applied Healthcare Statistics C784 Version 1
ASO1 Introduction to Statistics for Research Version 1
BJ01 Introduction to Business Finance Version 1
C172 Network and Security Foundations Version 1
C180 Introduction to Psychology Version 1
C180 Introduction to Psychology Version 2
CKC1 Introduction to Humanities Version 1
DZ01 Mathematics for Elementary Educators III MATH 1330 Version 1
- ✓ 500+ Practice Questions
- ✓ Detailed Explanations
- ✓ Progress Analytics
- ✓ Exam Simulations