A recent news report suggests that 30 firms that grow and export walnuts decide to form a cartel that aims to raise the price of walnuts and reduce output to increase profit. What can be predicted about the future of this cartel
The cartel will probably not be successful because the number of firms is unmanageable and there are substitutes for walnuts.
The success of a cartel largely depends on its ability to control prices and output effectively. In this case, the presence of substitutes for walnuts and the challenges of managing a larger number of firms make it difficult for the cartel to sustain its objectives.
This statement is incorrect because 30 firms is a considerable number for forming a cartel. While more firms can complicate management, the issue here is not the low number but rather the challenges in coordination and the existence of substitutes that undermine cartel effectiveness.
While it's true that domestic agreements can be enforceable, the success of the cartel hinges on its ability to reduce output and control prices. The limited geographic production does not guarantee success, especially when substitutes are available, which can lead consumers to switch away from walnuts if prices rise.
The presence of substitutes for walnuts means that if the cartel raises prices, consumers may easily turn to alternatives, reducing the cartel's market power. Additionally, managing a large number of firms makes it difficult to maintain consistent output control and pricing strategies, further undermining success.
This statement is inaccurate because if demand for walnuts were highly elastic, any price increase by the cartel would significantly decrease the quantity demanded. Therefore, rather than being successful, the cartel would likely face substantial challenges in maintaining higher prices without losing customers to substitutes.
In summary, while the formation of a walnut cartel may initially suggest potential for increased profits through price control, the realities of market dynamics—such as the availability of substitutes and the difficulty of managing multiple firms—render its success unlikely. The existence of alternatives to walnuts means that consumers have choices, which can undermine the cartel's pricing power and overall effectiveness.
Related Questions
View allWhich is true according to the theory of comparative advantage
The price of a product increases by 20% which leads to a short-run inc...
An individual deposits half of his salary in a bank account every mont...
What will result in a decrease in the supply of motorcycles
The larger firms in an industry have market shares of 20%, 10%, 5%, 18...
Related Quizzes
View all0PC1 Planning Instructional Strategies for Meaningful Learning Version 1
AP01 Elementary Literacy Curriculum Version 1
AQ01 Applied Healthcare Statistics C784 Version 1
ASO1 Introduction to Statistics for Research Version 1
BJ01 Introduction to Business Finance Version 1
C172 Network and Security Foundations Version 1
C180 Introduction to Psychology Version 1
C180 Introduction to Psychology Version 2
CKC1 Introduction to Humanities Version 1
DZ01 Mathematics for Elementary Educators III MATH 1330 Version 1
- ✓ 500+ Practice Questions
- ✓ Detailed Explanations
- ✓ Progress Analytics
- ✓ Exam Simulations