A project manager is assigned to a global project with dispersed team members. Previously, when working with remote teams, the project manager observed that team members do not tend to produce quality work. What should the project manager do to ensure the project is completed on time with quality?

While tracking time can help monitor productivity, it does not directly address the quality of work. Time sheets may encourage clock-watching rather than fostering a commitment to high-quality deliverables. Team members may prioritize completing tasks for the sake of meeting deadlines rather than focusing on the quality of their contributions.

Regular updates are beneficial for communication and can help identify obstacles, but they may not be sufficient to ensure that team members are producing quality work. Without defined targets and expectations, updates may lead to status reports rather than actionable insights or improvements in work quality.

Peer evaluations can provide valuable feedback but are typically retrospective and may not influence the quality of work during the project's execution. This approach lacks the proactive element of setting clear targets and does not facilitate ongoing communication, which is crucial for maintaining quality throughout the project lifecycle.