Which scenario represents a violation of the Equal Protection Clause?

This scenario does not violate the Equal Protection Clause as it applies uniformly to all drivers regardless of personal characteristics such as gender, race, or age. The law pertains to traffic regulation and safety, which are legitimate state interests and do not result in unequal treatment under the law.

This scenario does not represent a violation of the Equal Protection Clause. Amendments to the Constitution are subject to their own processes and requirements, and the criteria they establish for holding public office are not evaluated under the same principles as state laws under the Equal Protection Clause.

Similar to option C, this scenario does not violate the Equal Protection Clause, as constitutional amendments set qualifications for office holders. Age requirements for various public offices are common and are not typically considered discriminatory under the Equal Protection Clause.