Difficulty: Easy

Average Score: 89%

Which scenario best justifies why a customer's account might be closed by a financial institution?

Rationale

The customer uses a shipping company dealing with specially designated nationals.

Financial institutions are required to comply with regulations that prohibit transactions involving specially designated nationals (SDNs), which may include individuals or entities associated with criminal activities or terrorism. Engaging with such companies can lead to the closure of a customer's account to mitigate legal and financial risks for the institution.

A (The customer is the object of a civil subpoena.) YOUR ANSWER

While being the subject of a civil subpoena may raise concerns, it does not automatically justify the closure of an account. Subpoenas are legal documents requiring a person to testify or produce evidence and do not inherently indicate illegal activity that would necessitate account termination.

B (The account has transactions that triggered multiple suspicious activity reports.) YOUR ANSWER

Although multiple suspicious activity reports (SARs) may indicate potential illicit behavior, they do not directly mandate account closure. Financial institutions often investigate these reports before deciding on appropriate actions, which may include enhanced monitoring rather than immediate account closure.

C (The account shows periodic fixed amount remittances for tuition fees.) YOUR ANSWER

Regular remittances for tuition fees are typically lawful transactions and do not pose a risk that would justify account closure. Such activities are common and usually reflect legitimate financial planning, making them an unlikely reason for a financial institution to terminate an account.

D (The customer uses a shipping company dealing with specially designated nationals.) CORRECT

Engaging with a shipping company that deals with specially designated nationals can expose the financial institution to significant legal and reputational risks. Therefore, account closure is a necessary precaution to ensure compliance with regulations and to avoid facilitating unlawful activities.

Conclusion

Financial institutions must adhere to strict compliance requirements to prevent involvement in illegal activities. Among the scenarios presented, engaging with a shipping company associated with specially designated nationals poses a significant risk, justifying account closure as a protective measure. Other scenarios listed, while potentially concerning, do not inherently warrant such drastic action, emphasizing the importance of context in decisions regarding account management.

Related Questions

View all

Related Quizzes

View all

Anti Money Laundering Exam Answers

PREMIUM

Unlock Everything

✓ 500+ Practice Questions
✓ Detailed Explanations
✓ Progress Analytics
✓ Exam Simulations

Get Premium Access →