Difficulty: Medium

Average Score: 73%

Which of the following would be permissible under current federal fair housing laws

Rationale

Refusing to rent to a blind man because of a seeing-eye dog and pets are not allowed in the building is permissible under current federal fair housing laws.

Under federal fair housing laws, individuals with disabilities are entitled to reasonable accommodations, which may include allowing service animals even in no-pet housing. Therefore, while the landlord can enforce a no-pets policy, they must allow seeing-eye dogs as a necessary accommodation for the blind tenant.

A (refusing to rent to a blind man because of a seeing-eye dog and pets are not allowed in the building) CORRECT

This option reflects the legal requirement for landlords to make reasonable accommodations for individuals with disabilities. While the building may have a no-pets policy, seeing-eye dogs are classified as service animals and are exempt from such restrictions. Thus, this refusal is permissible due to the landlord's adherence to fair housing laws.

B (refusing to rent to a German couple because they do not speak and understand English) YOUR ANSWER

This refusal is discriminatory as it violates the fair housing laws that prohibit discrimination based on national origin. Language proficiency should not be a factor in housing decisions, and such refusal would be considered unlawful discrimination.

C (refusing to rent to a single parent because the kids are so noisy) YOUR ANSWER

This refusal could be viewed as discriminatory against families with children, which is prohibited under fair housing laws. Noise complaints should be addressed through regular tenant agreements and cannot be used as a basis for discrimination against single parents or families.

D (refusing to rent to a foreign person because of an expired visa) YOUR ANSWER

This action may constitute discrimination based on national origin or immigration status, which is protected under federal fair housing laws. Landlords cannot refuse housing based solely on a person's immigration status, making this refusal illegal.

Conclusion

In summary, while federal fair housing laws allow certain refusals under specific circumstances, such as enforcing no-pet policies regarding service animals, other refusals based on language, family status, or immigration status are discriminatory and illegal. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for compliance with fair housing regulations and ensuring equal opportunity in housing for all individuals.

Related Questions

View all