Difficulty: Medium

Average Score: 74%

An adaptive project manager is handling a five sprint cycle to deliver a minimum viable product (WAP). After the third sprint, the productivity of the team drops to 30% due from openness.

Which of the following changes has caused this loss in productivity?

Rationale

Two of the team members were asked to do multitasking, which they did not do in the previous two points.

Multitasking can lead to a significant drop in productivity, as it often causes distractions and reduces focus. When team members are asked to switch between tasks, they may struggle to maintain efficiency, which can explain the noted decline in productivity after the third sprint.

A (Two of the team members were asked to do multitasking, which they did not do in the previous two points.) CORRECT

Multitasking disrupts a team member’s flow and can cause confusion, leading to decreased productivity. In this scenario, the introduction of multitasking diverges from the previous sprints' workflow, contributing significantly to the team's reduced output.

B (The team picked up technical debt items in the third sprint as technical debt can only be added to after completing two sprints.) YOUR ANSWER

While taking on technical debt can impact a team's productivity, the statement suggests a conditional rule about timing rather than a direct cause of decreased productivity. If the team had effectively managed technical debt prior, the introduction of items alone wouldn't automatically result in a productivity drop.

C (Two of the team members have been working in close using different methods to validate their performance.) YOUR ANSWER

Although varying methods can sometimes lead to confusion, the collaboration itself isn't necessarily detrimental. As long as the team communicates effectively, different validation methods can be beneficial rather than a cause for productivity loss.

D (The team velocity was measured in the third sprint since this tool to measure velocity was introduced only in the third sprint.) YOUR ANSWER

Introducing a tool to measure velocity may initially require adjustment but does not inherently cause productivity loss. In fact, measuring velocity can provide valuable insights into team performance and help improve future sprints.

Conclusion

The drop in productivity after the third sprint can be directly attributed to the introduction of multitasking among team members, which diverges from their previous working style. While other factors like technical debt and measurement tools may influence team dynamics, they do not explain the immediate decline in productivity as effectively as the impact of multitasking. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for maintaining team efficiency in agile project management.

Related Questions

View all