Toys were packed into x boxes so that each box contained the same number of toys, with no toys left unpacked. If 3 fewer boxes had been used instead, then 12 toys would have been packed in each box, with 5 toys left unpacked. What is the value of x?
28 boxes were used to pack the toys.
Through the problem's conditions, we can derive that packing the toys into 28 boxes results in an equal distribution with no leftovers. When using 3 fewer boxes (25 boxes), 12 toys per box leads to a situation where 5 toys remain unpacked, confirming that the total number of toys can be expressed consistently.
If only 11 boxes were used, the calculation would not allow for a proper distribution of toys given the conditions of the problem. The scenario described would not accommodate the packing of additional toys without leaving any unpacked, given the constraints of the other box arrangements.
Using 14 boxes does not satisfy the conditions either, as it would not allow for the proper number of toys to lead to a situation where 12 toys could be packed in 25 boxes with 5 remaining. The calculations would not align with the total number of toys specified in the problem.
This choice represents the correct solution. When toys are divided into 28 boxes, each box contains an equal number of toys, fulfilling the requirement of no leftover toys. Furthermore, when 3 boxes are removed, the remaining 25 boxes can hold 12 toys each with 5 left unpacked, which aligns with the problem’s stipulations.
If 31 boxes were used, it would imply that packing toys into fewer boxes would not yield a realistic scenario where exactly 12 toys per box could be achieved with 5 leftover. The numbers would not compute correctly under the conditions provided.
Selecting 34 boxes also fails to meet the problem's requirements, as it would create a situation where the distribution of toys would again not conform to the defined constraints of the fewer boxes holding 12 toys each with leftovers remaining.
The problem reveals that 28 boxes are necessary to achieve an equal distribution of toys without any left unpacked. The relationships between box numbers and toy counts create a mathematical condition where only this option provides a valid solution to the scenario described, confirming the integrity of the calculations and the logical consistency of the problem.
Related Questions
View allThe primary purpose of the passage is to
The researcher observed that the cells in her experiment were irregula...
The effect of the distant past on an individual's financial decisions...
In the distribution of heights in a group of a thousand people, height...
Unlike mainstream publications, which centered on images of women as m...
Related Quizzes
View allOfficial GRE Quantitative Reasoning Practice Questions
GRE Quantitative Reasoning Practice Questions
ETS Official GRE Quantitative Reasoning Practice Questions
GRE Quantitative Reasoning Practice Test
Official GRE Quantitative Reasoning Practice
GRE Quantitative Reasoning Practice Problems
- ✓ 500+ Practice Questions
- ✓ Detailed Explanations
- ✓ Progress Analytics
- ✓ Exam Simulations