The zoning ordinance setback is 25' for the zone in which a subdivision is located. The subdivision covenants stipulate that buildings must have a 35' setback. A builder who wishes to build a house in this subdivision must adhere to a minimum setback of
35', because the more restrictive condition always takes precedence.
In scenarios involving zoning ordinances and subdivision covenants, the more restrictive requirement must be followed. Since the subdivision covenants mandate a 35' setback, this is the condition the builder must adhere to, superseding the less stringent zoning ordinance.
This choice is incorrect because while zoning ordinances typically govern land use, they do not automatically take precedence over subdivision covenants. In this case, the covenants are more restrictive, thus they must be followed.
This statement is misleading as it suggests that subdivision covenants are not enforceable. In reality, covenants are often legally binding and can impose stricter requirements than zoning ordinances, which is the case here with the 35' setback.
This statement is accurate. When faced with conflicting regulations, the more restrictive condition (in this case, the 35' setback from the subdivision covenants) must be adhered to, ensuring compliance with the stricter requirement.
While covenants often can take precedence when they are more restrictive, this statement is overly broad. It does not account for scenarios where zoning ordinances might set minimum standards; thus, it lacks nuance and specificity regarding the conditions being considered.
In the given scenario, the builder must comply with the subdivision covenants that require a 35' setback, as they are more restrictive than the zoning ordinance's 25' requirement. Understanding the hierarchy of regulations is essential, and in this case, the more stringent rule prevails, ensuring that the subdivision maintains its intended character and standards.
Related Questions
View allThe listing price is usually the
Foreclosure sale $100,000; loan $70,000 + $5,000 expenses. Surplus to:
Under the Illinois Real Estate License Act of 2000, which of the follo...
Limiting neighborhoods by buyer's race is
Bilateral vs. unilateral contract differs by:
Related Quizzes
View allAlabama Property and Casualty License Practice Exam
California Real Estate Practice Final Exam Answers
PSI National Real Estate License Exam Prep
Colorado State Real Estate License Exam
Illinois Real Estate Exam Prep Online
Illinois Real Estate Broker Exam Prep
Illinois Real Estate Exam Study Guide PDF
Illinois National Real Estate Exam
Illinois Real Estate State Exam Questions
Maryland Real Estate Salesperson Exam Study Guide
- ✓ 500+ Practice Questions
- ✓ Detailed Explanations
- ✓ Progress Analytics
- ✓ Exam Simulations