Smith had an easement by necessity to use a road near Johnson's farmhouse. The pickup truck that Smith drove sent dust toward the house. Does this give Johnson grounds to terminate the easement

This statement is misleading; while easements should ideally balance the interests of both parties, an easement by necessity primarily exists to serve the dominant estate's need for access. The necessity of access outweighs the inconvenience caused to the servient estate.

This choice misrepresents the nature of easements by necessity. Such easements are not subject to the whims of the servient estate holder; rather, they are legal rights established to provide essential access to the dominant estate. Termination cannot occur solely at the pleasure of the servient estate holder.

While easements by necessity are difficult to terminate, this statement is inaccurate as it implies an absolute immunity from termination. Situations may arise where an easement can be terminated, particularly if the necessity ceases to exist or if an alternative access route is established.