It can be inferred from the passage that both Tulving and Clayton would agree with which of the following statements?
Animals' abilities to use information about a specific past event are not conclusive evidence of episodic memory.
Both Tulving and Clayton suggest that while animals can demonstrate memory of past events, this does not necessarily equate to true episodic memory as defined by humans. Tulving emphasizes the unique human capacity to travel back in time mentally, while Clayton indicates that animal memory may lack the depth of reexperiencing past events.
This aligns with both Tulving's and Clayton's views that the capacity to remember specific past events in animals, such as scrub jays, does not definitively indicate they possess episodic memory in the same way humans do. Their behaviors may reflect memory use without the full cognitive reexperiencing characteristic of episodic memory.
While this statement aligns with Tulving's definition of episodic memory, it is not directly supported by Clayton’s findings. Clayton suggests that animals like scrub jays can remember contextual details about past events, yet he stops short of confirming that they reexperience those events as humans do.
This statement is not directly supported by the passage. Clayton's experiments specifically test the memory accuracy of scrub jays, indicating that it is possible to evaluate their memory through structured experimentation, even if it does not confirm episodic memory.
This claim is not discussed in the passage and does not reflect the core argument made by either Tulving or Clayton. The passage focuses on the complexity of episodic memory rather than comparing the accuracy of single bits of information between species.
This statement contradicts Tulving's definition of episodic memory, which emphasizes the binding of components of an event. Both Tulving and Clayton highlight the importance of this feature in understanding episodic memory, making this choice incorrect.
Tulving and Clayton both emphasize the distinction between simple memory use and true episodic memory. The agreement on the limitations of animal memory regarding episodic memory reinforces the idea that while animals can utilize past information, it does not confirm the presence of the complex reexperiencing ability associated with human memory. Thus, the most accurate inference is that animals' capabilities in this area are not definitive evidence of episodic memory.
Related Questions
View allAccording to the passage, which of the following can be cited as the k...
The passage indicates that default options can be attractive to custom...
The primary purpose of the passage is to
A new drug has been developed that, when administered to stroke victim...
Which of the following would, if true, most strongly support the carto...
Related Quizzes
View allGmat Quantitative Reasoning Practice Questions
Quantitative Reasoning GMAT
Gmat Quantitative Reasoning Practice
Official Gmat Data Insights Practice Questions
GMAT 2025 Exam Changes Verbal Reasoning
GMAT Exam Changes 2025 Verbal Reasoning March 2025
- ✓ 500+ Practice Questions
- ✓ Detailed Explanations
- ✓ Progress Analytics
- ✓ Exam Simulations