In lines 2-3, the statement about climate historians suggests that they are considered by certain other scholars to be
Basically unwelcome.
The statement implies that climate historians face skepticism and resistance from traditional historians and archaeologists, who already contend with numerous factors affecting civilizations. This indicates that climate historians are not readily accepted within the broader academic community focused on the study of past civilizations.
While intelligence can be subjectively assessed, the reference to climate historians in the text does not highlight their intelligence as a point of contention. Instead, it focuses on the reluctance of other scholars to embrace their contributions, which does not correlate with a judgment on intelligence.
The term "overly disciplined" does not accurately reflect the sentiment expressed in the passage. The text addresses a lack of acceptance rather than critiquing the methods or rigor of climate historians. Thus, this choice misinterprets the nature of the resistance faced.
The passage does not suggest that climate historians are distant or uninvolved in scholarly discourse. Instead, it focuses on the dismissive attitude of other historians towards their work, making "unusually aloof" an inaccurate characterization of their situation.
The text does not accuse climate historians of being misinformed; rather, it suggests that their insights are often disregarded. The emphasis is on the reluctance to consider climate as a significant factor, rather than on the accuracy of the historians' claims.
The passage illustrates the challenges faced by climate historians in gaining acceptance among traditional scholars, highlighting a perception of being unwelcome due to the complexities of integrating climate factors into the study of civilization decline. The skepticism expressed by historians and archaeologists reflects a broader resistance to acknowledging climate's role, rather than a critique of the historians' competence or knowledge.
Related Questions
View allThe author mentions the 'archaeologist' (line 6) as an example of a sc...
Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage?
The author suggests that 'we have been conned into believing' (line 9)...
Compared with the tone of Passage 2, the tone of Passage 1 is more
The author of Passage 2 would most likely view the claim attributed to...
Related Quizzes
View allPraxis 5001 Test with Answers
Praxis 5002 Study Guide
5002 Praxis Practice Test
Reading & Language Arts Praxis 5002
Praxis 5002 Reading and Language Arts Exam
Praxis 5003 Exam with Outline
5003 Praxis Math Answers
Praxis 5003 Study Guide
Praxis Social Studies 5004
Praxis 5004 Social Studies
- ✓ 500+ Practice Questions
- ✓ Detailed Explanations
- ✓ Progress Analytics
- ✓ Exam Simulations