During sprint planning, the product owner wants to prioritize items with high business value. However, the project team is concerned about technical debt and infrastructure dependencies to deliver the expected value. How should the project manager handle this issue?

While a voting exercise may promote team engagement and allow diverse opinions to surface, it does not directly address the underlying issues of technical debt and infrastructure dependencies. This approach could lead to indecision or dilute the focus necessary for resolving critical concerns that impact the project’s success.

This option risks overlooking significant technical debt and dependencies that could hinder the delivery of high business value in the future. Prioritizing only high-value items without addressing these concerns can result in increased complications and potential project failures, as the team may struggle to implement business features effectively.

While the project sponsor's input is vital, a top-down approach may ignore the team's insights and expertise regarding technical debt and dependencies. This method can lead to decisions that do not consider the practical challenges the team faces, potentially undermining project quality and team morale.