Assuming that one of the two conclusions cited above is correct, which of the following, if discovered at the site, would most help determine which is the correct one?

While human food residues could indicate some level of human activity, they do not necessarily prove that the mound was used as a permanent site. The food could have been deposited during intermittent visits, making this evidence ambiguous regarding the nature of the site's use.

Finding evidence of the bells being part of clothing would suggest some cultural practices, but it does not provide definitive proof about the nature of the mound's use. The bells could have been used in both permanent or temporary settings, thus failing to clarify the conclusions drawn.

While these basket fragments could indicate some form of storage or transport, they do not directly imply regular habitation or sustained use of the mound. Their presence alone would not determine whether the site was part of a permanent village or used for sporadic rituals.

Although these trails suggest connectivity to other villages, they do not confirm that the mound itself was a permanent feature. The trails could have been used for various purposes, including temporary visitation, without indicating the nature of the mound's use.