An FN and their child had a joint refugee claim rejected and didn't leave Canada within 30 days of the removal order becoming enforceable. Now 17 years old, the child is detained while attempting to re-enter Canada from the United States without an ARC. The child asks an RCIC what happens next.

This choice suggests immediate deportation based on a prior order, but it does not account for the legal process involved. Before any deportation can take place, the individual is entitled to attend an admissibility hearing to explore their current situation and potential eligibility for re-entry.

While this choice may seem plausible, the Minister's delegate cannot simply issue a new deportation order without first conducting an admissibility hearing. The hearing is necessary to determine any changes in the child's circumstances or legal grounds for entry, thus making this option premature.

This option incorrectly assumes that the child can make a new refugee claim upon re-entry. However, since the joint refugee claim was rejected and they did not leave Canada within the stipulated time, they may not be eligible to make another claim without undergoing the admissibility process first.