An employee in a corporation's finance department hears news of an internal investigation into potential fraud within the company, quits her job, and disappears. If they had been observed before her resignation, which characteristics of the employee would have been considered red flags?

While being from a high-risk jurisdiction might raise concerns, it is not a definitive indicator of fraudulent behavior. Many individuals from such areas can have legitimate reasons for their background, and this characteristic alone does not provide sufficient grounds to label them as a red flag.

Evasiveness in communication can strongly suggest that an individual is hiding something. In the context of a finance department, this behavior is particularly alarming, as it may indicate involvement in unethical or illegal activities that prompted the resignation.

A lavish lifestyle that exceeds what can be supported by an individual's reported income is a significant red flag. It raises suspicion about the source of their funds, potentially pointing to financial misconduct or fraud. This discrepancy between lifestyle and income warrants further investigation.

Having friends in high-risk industries may not directly indicate fraudulent behavior. Many individuals maintain social connections in various sectors for legitimate reasons. This characteristic is too vague to serve as a reliable indicator of misconduct.