An agile project is running activities to define the minimum viable product (MVP). During the session, the project manager identifies some mandatory regulations, but there is no consensus to include these regulations in the MVP because it may extend the duration of the project.What should the project manager do?

While obtaining additional time may seem like a solution, it does not address the immediate need for the team to commit to including the mandatory regulations in the MVP. Simply extending the timeline without team commitment may lead to future conflicts regarding project scope and compliance.

Training the team on regulations is beneficial but does not resolve the issue of including those regulations in the MVP. This approach focuses on knowledge enhancement rather than action on the project's deliverables. Without commitment to implement the regulations, training alone will not ensure compliance.

This option dismisses the importance of compliance with regulations, which can have serious implications for the project's success and legal standing. Focusing solely on product functionality undermines the necessity of including mandatory regulations in the MVP, potentially risking project viability.