An agile project is running activities to define the minimum viable product (MVP). During the session, the project manager identifies some mandatory regulations, but there is no consensus to include these regulations in the MVP because it may extend the duration of the project. What should the project manager do?

While focusing on product functionality is important, disregarding mandatory regulations can lead to legal issues and project failures. This approach may undermine the project's integrity and does not address the necessity of compliance, which is vital for the MVP.

Requesting more time from the project sponsor may not be the best solution, especially if it leads to further delays without addressing the core issue of compliance. This choice does not promote team commitment or collaboration in resolving the regulatory challenges within the current project timeline.

Training the team on new regulations is beneficial, but it does not directly address the immediate need to include these regulations in the MVP. This option overlooks the urgency of team commitment to integrate regulations into the product development process, which is essential for ensuring compliance from the outset.