According to a purchase agreement, the buyer has the right to a final inspection. The cost of this inspection will be paid from the earnest money deposit.

The term "automatically" implies that the cost of the inspection is incurred without the need for mutual agreement, which is not accurate. The obligation to pay for the inspection arises only when both parties explicitly consent to the terms in the purchase agreement.

This choice suggests that the cost is contingent solely on the outcome of the inspection revealing misrepresentation, which is misleading. The agreement does not stipulate that the buyer's right to have the inspection paid from the earnest money is conditional on the inspection results; rather, it depends on prior written agreement between the parties.

Stating "under no circumstances" incorrectly implies that the buyer has no right to have the inspection cost covered by the earnest money deposit at any time. This contradicts the terms of the purchase agreement, which allow for such an arrangement if agreed upon in writing.