A broker had an exclusive right to sell listing on a house. The broker would have been in violation of license law if the broker had NOT done which of the following

While putting the listing in the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) is a common practice that can enhance visibility, it is not a legal obligation for all listing agreements. A broker may choose to market the property through various channels, and not utilizing the MLS does not inherently violate license law.

Insisting on dual agency, where a broker represents both the buyer and the seller, is a choice that brokers can make but is not required by license law. In fact, dual agency can present ethical concerns and requires proper disclosure and consent, making it a situation that does not relate directly to the exclusivity of the listing contract.

Providing a seller with a comparable market analysis (CMA) is a valuable service that can assist in pricing the property effectively. However, it is not a legal requirement for maintaining an exclusive right to sell listing. Failing to supply a CMA does not constitute a violation of license law.