Question 1 of 5 Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Copy Link The government railroad plans to replace its old cross-country trains, which have a maximum speed of 80 miles per hour, with new trains that have a maximum speed of 125 miles per hour. But the tracks on which the trains will run cannot handle trains at speeds higher than 80 miles per hour. Therefore the new trains will not be able to make the cross-country trip in less time than the old trains. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. Because they have a reputation for excellent service, the older trains are preferred by many train travelers. B. The cross-country train route includes hills that prevent any train from traveling at its maximum speed. C. The new trains are designed to require regularly scheduled maintenance between trips less frequently than the old trains. D. Most people who want to travel across the country in less time than it currently takes by train will travel by airplane. E. The railroad's new schedules call for longer stops at each station on the cross-country route. Submit Answer
Question 2 of 5 Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Copy Link A new drug has been developed that, when administered to stroke victims within three hours after the onset of a stroke, increases their chances of making a complete recovery by 50 percent. Yet even though the drug is likely to be approved for widespread use for stroke victims by next year, a dramatic increase in the stroke recovery rate is unlikely for some time, for the simple reason that __________Which of the following most logically completes the argument? A. government and private insurance policies will not reimburse patients for drugs that have not been approved for widespread use among its intended beneficiaries B. the drug has been approved already for use on people who have suffered heart attacks C. in coming years growing numbers of people will be of an age at which the likelihood of suffering a stroke is greatest D. another drug being tested for treatment of strokes appears to be effective when given as late as twenty-four hours after the stroke's onset E. the symptoms of stroke are typically so subtle that they are rarely recognized as signs of a medical emergency Submit Answer
Question 3 of 5 Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Copy Link In almost every purchasing decision, customers have the option to walk away. So the marketer's basic task is to persuade shoppers to part with their money. For example, retailers have known for years that allowing customers to delay payment can dramatically increase their willingness to buy. One reason delayed payments work is that the time value of money makes future payments less costly than immediate ones. But there is another, less rational basis for this phenomenon. Payments, like all losses, are viscerally unpleasant. So even small delays in payment can soften the immediate sting of parting with money and remove an important barrier to purchase. Yet the customer's aversion to losses offers marketers another strategy. There is overwhelming evidence that presenting customers with a particular option as a default increases the likelihood of that option's being chosen. This is illustrated by a case in which an Italian telecom company succeeded in increasing the acceptance rate of an offer made to customers who called to cancel their existing service. Originally, a script informed the customers that they would receive one hundred free calls if they kept their plan. When the script was reworded to say, We have already credited your account with one hundred calls, how could you use those? many more customers, not wanting to lose free talk time that they felt they already owned, kept their plan. A default, an unsolicited benefit the customer obtains unless the customer rejects it, works partly by instilling a perception of ownership before any purchase takes place, as the pleasure people derive from gains is less intense than the pain from equivalent losses. When we are given something by default, it becomes more valued than it would have been otherwise, and we are more loath to reject it. Defaults work best when decision makers are too indifferent, confused, or conflicted to consider their options. This principle is particularly relevant in a world that is increasingly awash with choices: a default eliminates the need to make a decision. The default, however, must also be a good choice for people. Attempting to mislead customers will ultimately backfire by breeding distrust. Based on the passage, it is most reasonable to infer that the author would agree with which of the following? A. It is not desirable to use the marketing strategy of default options with consumers who are influenced by nonrational factors. B. Presenting customers with a default option is an alternative to the strategy of allowing delayed payments and is best not used in conjunction with it. C. Consumers who are presented with so many choices that they experience confusion are unlikely to reach a decision. D. Steering customers toward choices that they would ultimately find unsatisfactory is an imprudent marketing practice. E. Allowing customers to delay payment is not a strategy that marketers should widely encourage. Submit Answer
Question 4 of 5 Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Copy Link In almost every purchasing decision, customers have the option to walk away. So the marketer's basic task is to persuade shoppers to part with their money. For example, retailers have known for years that allowing customers to delay payment can dramatically increase their willingness to buy. One reason delayed payments work is that the time value of money makes future payments less costly than immediate ones. But there is another, less rational basis for this phenomenon. Payments, like all losses, are viscerally unpleasant. So even small delays in payment can soften the immediate sting of parting with money and remove an important barrier to purchase. Yet the customer's aversion to losses offers marketers another strategy. There is overwhelming evidence that presenting customers with a particular option as a default increases the likelihood of that option's being chosen. This is illustrated by a case in which an Italian telecom company succeeded in increasing the acceptance rate of an offer made to customers who called to cancel their existing service. Originally, a script informed the customers that they would receive one hundred free calls if they kept their plan. When the script was reworded to say, We have already credited your account with one hundred calls, how could you use those? many more customers, not wanting to lose free talk time that they felt they already owned, kept their plan. A default, an unsolicited benefit the customer obtains unless the customer rejects it, works partly by instilling a perception of ownership before any purchase takes place, as the pleasure people derive from gains is less intense than the pain from equivalent losses. When we are given something by default, it becomes more valued than it would have been otherwise, and we are more loath to reject it. Defaults work best when decision makers are too indifferent, confused, or conflicted to consider their options. This principle is particularly relevant in a world that is increasingly awash with choices: a default eliminates the need to make a decision. The default, however, must also be a good choice for people. Attempting to mislead customers will ultimately backfire by breeding distrust. The primary purpose of the passage is to A. compare the effectiveness of two different marketing strategies B. critique the prevailing views about a particular marketing strategy C. describe a strategy marketers can use to help sell their goods or services D. alert consumers to marketing strategies that exploit their aversion to loss E. describe successful applications of a particular marketing strategy Submit Answer
Question 5 of 5 Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Copy Link In almost every purchasing decision, customers have the option to walk away. So the marketer's basic task is to persuade shoppers to part with their money. For example, retailers have known for years that allowing customers to delay payment can dramatically increase their willingness to buy. One reason delayed payments work is that the time value of money makes future payments less costly than immediate ones. But there is another, less rational basis for this phenomenon. Payments, like all losses, are viscerally unpleasant. So even small delays in payment can soften the immediate sting of parting with money and remove an important barrier to purchase. Yet the customer's aversion to losses offers marketers another strategy. There is overwhelming evidence that presenting customers with a particular option as a default increases the likelihood of that option's being chosen. This is illustrated by a case in which an Italian telecom company succeeded in increasing the acceptance rate of an offer made to customers who called to cancel their existing service. Originally, a script informed the customers that they would receive one hundred free calls if they kept their plan. When the script was reworded to say, We have already credited your account with one hundred calls, how could you use those? many more customers, not wanting to lose free talk time that they felt they already owned, kept their plan. A default, an unsolicited benefit the customer obtains unless the customer rejects it, works partly by instilling a perception of ownership before any purchase takes place, as the pleasure people derive from gains is less intense than the pain from equivalent losses. When we are given something by default, it becomes more valued than it would have been otherwise, and we are more loath to reject it. Defaults work best when decision makers are too indifferent, confused, or conflicted to consider their options. This principle is particularly relevant in a world that is increasingly awash with choices: a default eliminates the need to make a decision. The default, however, must also be a good choice for people. Attempting to mislead customers will ultimately backfire by breeding distrust. The passage indicates that default options can be attractive to customers because they sometimes A. relieve customers of a burdensome decision-making process B. are less likely than other available marketing strategies to undermine customers' trust C. make transactions faster and less complex than they would otherwise be D. allow customers to delay their payments for an agreed period of time E. offer a greater benefit to the customers than to the seller Submit Answer